Keywords
ironía
ética
escepticismo,
política satire
irony
ethics
skepticism
politics
How to Cite
Abstract
Jonathan Swift attacks modern authors for considering them superficial. Denouncing their language –satire– the author calls into question his own art. Satire’s disposition in relation to arguments is skeptical. In order to destabilize the reader’s perspective, satire develops the diffi cult task of equal force (skeptical isosthéneia) of arguments. If ancient skepticism sought to get rid of language through its discursive practices, in order to attain the tranquility of the soul, satirical text transfers the moment of decision to the reader. This transference or suspension of decision and the use in discursive order of simulation and dissimulation, with which Machiavelli (a favorite author to Swift) characterizes political practices, confer satire its ethical and political dimension.
References
Aristophane. “Les Nuées.” Comédies. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1963.
Aristote. Physique. Traducción y presentación de Pierre Pellegrin. Paris: Flammarion, 2002.
Bourde, André. “Les “Lumières” 1715-1789”. Histoire de La France, dès origines à nos jours. Paris: Larousse, 1999.
Bullitt, John M. Jonathan Swift and the anatomy of satire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966.
Clark, George. The Oxford History of England: The Later Stuarts, 1660-1714. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
Davis, Herbert. “Literary Satire in ‘A Tale of a Tub’”. Swift, modern judgements. Ed. A. Norman Jeffares. London: Macmillan, 1968.
DePorte, Michael. Nightmares and Hobbyhorses, Swift, Sterne, and Augustan Ideas of Madness. San Marino: The Huntington Library, 1974.
De Undurraga, Francisco. “La impronta de las apariencias. Afección y continuo del conocimiento en el Escepticismo antiguo”. Revista de Filosofía 64 (2008): 33-48.
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan or The Matter, Forme & Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill. London: the Green Dragon in St. Pauls Church-yard, 1651.
Liddell and Scott. An Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Machiavel, Nicolas. Le Prince. Trad. Jacqueline Risset. Paris: Babel, 2001.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. “Ensayo de autocrítica”. El Origen de la Tragedia. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, 1975.
Orwell, George. “Politics vs. Literature: an examination of Gulliver’s Travels”. Swift, modern judgements. Ed. A. Norman Jeffares. London: Macmillan, 1968.
Oyarzún, Pablo. “La cosa que era Swift”. La letra volada. Ensayos sobre literatura. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales, 2009.
Parnell, J.T. “Swift, Sterne, and the Skeptical Tradition”. Critical Essays on Lawrence Sterne. Ed. Melvyn New. New York: G.K Hall and Co, 1998.
Platón. Fedro. Madrid: Editorial Gredos, 1997.
Quintana, Ricardo. Two Augustans, John Locke, Jonathan Swift. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1978.
La Rochefoucauld, François de. “Réfl exions ou Sentences et Maximes morales”. Oeuvres Complètes. Paris: Garnier Frères, 1884.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “Discours sur l’origine de l’inégalité”. OEuvres complètes. Paris: Gallimard, 1959.
Sextus Empiricus. Esquisses pyrrhoniennes. Edición bilingüe griego-francés. Introducción, traducción y comentarios de Pierre Pellegrin. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1997.
Suarez, Michael F. “Swift’s satire and parody”. The Cambridge Companion to Jonathan Swift. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Swift, Jonathan. “A Tale of a Tub”. A Modest Proposal and other satires. Köln: Könneman, 1997.
Swift, Jonathan. “The Battle of the books”. A Modest Proposal and other satires. Köln: Könneman, 1997.
Swift, Jonathan. Journal to Stella. Ed. Harold Williams. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
Swift, Jonathan. The Writings of Jonathan Swift. London: WW Norton & Company, 1973.
Swift, Jonathan. Gulliver’s Travels. London: Penguin Books, 2003.
Williams, Harold. “Introduction”. Journal to Stella. Ed. Harold Williams. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
Woolf, Virginia. “Swift’s Journal to Stella”. Swift, modern judgements. Ed. A. Norman Jeffares. London: Macmillan, 1968.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de humanidades (Santiago. En línea)