Justice as a particularist ethical criterion in platonic philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53382/issn.2452-445X.1046Keywords:
Plato, Ancient Philosophy, Politics, Ethics of JusticeAbstract
In this paper we explore Plato's particularist conception of justice, emphasizing its link with the ideals of the common good and social order. This conception contrasts with the Plato's political emphasis since, for some interpreters of his philosophy, aspirations of citizens are relegated in accordance with demands and specialized functions that they possess. However we propose a reorientation of desire towards what is beneficial for citizen and city based on Republic IV, contrary to the alleged rupture between the internal order of the citizen and the social order, between individual aspirations and demands of the common good, conceived in terms of harmony by the Athenian philosopher in question.
Downloads
References
ANNAS, JULIA. An introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1981.
ANNAS, JULIA. Platonic ethics, old and new. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999.
BIEDA, ESTEBAN. “La irracionalidad interna del alma y la vigencia del intelectualismo socrático en la República de Platón”. Cuadernos de Filosofía, No. 65, 2015, pp. 15-32. https://doi.org/10.34096/cf.n65.3631
BLÖSSNER, NORBERT. “The city-soul analogy”. The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Editado y traducido por Giovanni Ferrari. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 345-385.
CATENARO, FRANCO. Il pensiero politico in Platone. La vita política come scelta di vita morale. Teramo: Ricerche & Redazioni, 2013.
FERRARI, GIOVANNI. “The three-part soul”. The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Editado por Giovanni Ferrari. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 165-201.
FIERRO, MARÍA ANGÉLICA. “La deducción de las partes del alma de un conflicto de deseos en República IV”. Thémata. Revista de Filosofía, No. 38, 2007, pp. 61-75.
FOSSATI, MANILO. “Socrates’ defence of justice in the Republic: the dialogical dynamic and the importance of the consequences of justice”. Plato Journal, No. 23, 2022, pp. 51-68. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_23_4
FOSSATI, MANILO. “Injustice and instability in Plato’s Republic: the case of the timocracy and its rulers”. Plato Journal, No. 25, 2024, pp. 55-66. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_25_4
FOSTER, MALCOLM. “On Plato’s conception of justice in the Republic”. The Philosophical Quarterly, No. 3, Vol. 1, 1951, pp. 206-217.
GANSON, TODD. “The rational/non rational distinction in Plato’s Republic”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XXXVI. Editado por Brad Inwood. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, 179-198.
GUTHRIE, WILLIAM. Historia de la Filosofía Griega IV. Platón. Traducido por Álvaro Vallejo Campos y Alberto Medina. Madrid: Gredos, 1990.
GUTHRIE, WILLIAM. Historia de la Filosofía Griega V. Traducido por Alberto Medina. Madrid: Gredos, 1992.
HALL, RICHARD. “Justice and the individual in the Republic”. Phronesis, No. 2, Vol. 4, 1959, pp. 149-158.
KRAUT, RICHARD. “The defense of justice in Plato’s Republic”. The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Editado por Richard Kraut. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, 311-337.
KOSMAN, ARYEH. “Justice and virtue: The Republic’s inquiry into proper difference”. The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Editado por Giovanni Ferrari. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 116-137.
LANE, MELISSA. “Plato’s political philosophy: The Republic, the Statesman and the Laws”. A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Editado por Mary Louise Gill & Pierre Pellegrin. Malden: Balckwell Publishing, 2006, 170-191.
LANZA, DIEGO Y MARIO VEGETTI. “L’idiologia della città”. L’ideologia della città. Editado por Diego Lanza y otros. Napoli: Liguori Editori, 1977, 13-29.
LARSEN, JENS. “Seeing double: divisions of eide and division labor in Plato’s Republic”. Plato Journal, No. 22, 2021, pp. 101-114. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_22_8
LEBAR, MARK. “Virtue and politics”. The Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics. Editado por Daniel C. Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 265-289.
MCDAVID, BRENNAN. “Meddling in the work of another. πολυπραγμονεῖν in Plato’s Republic”. Plato Journal, No. 23, 2022, pp. 95-109. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_23_7
MOSS, JESSICA. “Shame, pleasure and the divided soul”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XXIX. Editado por David Sedley. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 137-170.
MOSS, JESSICA. “Appearances and calculations: Plato’s division of the soul”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XXXIV. Editado por David Sedley. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 35-68.
NEU, JEROME. “Plato’s analogy of the state and individual: The Republic and the organic theory of the state”. Philosophy, No. 177, Vol. 46, 1971, pp. 238-254.
OPPONG, STEPHEN. “Re-examining of compulsion problem in Plato’s Republic”. Plato Journal, No. 22, 2021, pp. 177-197. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_22_12
PARRY, RICHARD. “Choosing and desire in Plato’s Republic”. Plato Journal, No. 24, 2023, pp. 29-44. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_24_3
PLATÓN. Opera Omnia. Compilado por John Burnet. Oxford: Bibliotheca Oxoniensis, 1900‒1907.
PLATÓN. Diálogos III. República, Parménides y Teeteto. Traducido por Conrado Eggers Lan, María Isabel Santa Cruz y Álvaro Vallejo. Madrid: Gredos, 2014.
PLATÓN. República. Traducido por Antonio Gómez Robledo. México: Bibliotheca Græcorum et Romanorum Mexicana, 2016.
RENAUT, OLIVIER. “Thumos and doxa as intermediates in the Republic”. Plato Journal, No. 18, 2018, pp. 71-82. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_18_6
ROWE, CHRISTOPHER. “The place of Republic in Plato’s political thought”. The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Editado por Giovanni Ferrari. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 27-54.
RUSSELL, DANIEL. “Virtue ethics, happiness and the good life”. The Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics. Editado por Daniel C. Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 7-28.
SCHOFIELD, MALCOLM. “Approaching the Republic”. The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Editado por Christopher Rowe & Malcolm Schofield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 190-232.
STALLEY, RICHARD. “Persuasion and the tripartite soul in Plato’s Republic”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy XXXII. Editado por David Sedley. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, 63-90.
TABAKIAN, DIEGO. “La individualidad en la República: las críticas de Aristóteles a Platón”. Stylos, No. 20, 2011, pp. 221-230.
TAYLOR, ALFRED. Platón. Traducido por Carmen García Trevijano. Madrid: Tecnos, 2005.
VALENCIA MARÍN, ESTIVEN. “Intelectualismo ético de Platón: relación de gnoseología ética a partir del libro VII de República”. Análisis, No. 98, Vol. 53, 2021, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.15332/21459169.5556
VALENCIA MARÍN, ESTIVEN. “El problema del placer en los programas legislativo y educativo platónicos”. Universitas Philosophica, No. 82, Vol. 41, 2024, pp. 119-135. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.uph41-82.pple
VALLEJO CAMPOS, ÁLVARO. Platón. El filósofo de Atenas. Barcelona: Montesinos, 1996.
VALLEJO CAMPOS, ÁLVARO. Adonde nos lleve el logos. Para leer la República de Platón. Madrid: Editorial Trotta, 2018.
VAN ZYL, LIELZ. “Virtue ethics and right action”. The Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics. Editado por Daniel C. Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, 172-196.
VEGETTI, MARIO. “Il dominio e la legge”. L’ideologia della città. Editado por Diego Lanza y otros. Napoli: Liguori Editori, 1977, 29-56.
VEGETTI, MARIO. Il potere della verità. Saggi platonici. Roma: Carocci Editore, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Estiven Valencia Marín

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal retain their copyright and, at the same time, grant the journal the right of first publication of their work under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This license allows third parties to share, copy, redistribute, adapt, and reuse the content in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that proper credit is given to the original authorship, the source of publication is indicated, and any modifications made are clearly identified.







