The Wisdom of Aspect: ‘Seeing what is seen in the Light’ as the Way to think the Being and its Being
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

Keywords

Visión
Luz
Aspecto
Metafísica
Aristóteles Vision
Light
Aspect
Metaphysics
Aristotle

How to Cite

Johnson, F. . “The Wisdom of Aspect: ‘Seeing What Is Seen in the Light’ As the Way to Think the Being and Its Being”. Revista De Humanidades (Santiago. En línea), no. 46, July 2022, pp. 123-51, doi:10.53382/issn.2452-445X.606.

Abstract

In times when scientific research bases its results on empirical evidence, the validity of a metaphysical reflection seems to be discredited. However, this article shows that the laws of a metaphysical study emerge from a critique of the perception of the senses and its lability. Thus, it discusses the laws and meaning of a metaphysics from Aristotle’s thought, by using a characterization of his thinking as “metaphysics of light”. This discussion reveals the need to perceive the being according to its aspect and the pertinence of an analogy between to see, be seen, light and knowledge, the being and its Being. Thus, in light of the metaphysical idea of “knowing of being in its Being”, the article proposes understanding it in the sense of “seeing what is seen in the light” while taking care to not identify the Being of real being with its sensible appearance.

https://doi.org/10.53382/issn.2452-445X.606
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

References

Aoiz, Javier y Deyvis Deniz. “Precisiones en torno al uso de aístima en Aristóteles”. Praesentia Aristotélica, 2006, pp. 196-222.

Aristóteles. Acerca del alma. Madrid: Gredos, 2003.

Aristóteles. Metafísica. Madrid: Gredos, 1994.

Aubenque, Pierre. Le problème de l’être chez Aristote. París: PUF, 1983.

Benoist, Jocelyn. Logique dú phénomène. París: Hermann, 2016.

Bremer, Dieter. “Hinweise zum griechischen Ursprung und zur europäischen Geschichte der Lichtmetaphysik”. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, vol. 17, 1973, pp. 7-35.

Bultmann, Rudolf. “Zur Geschichte der Lichtsymbolik im Altertum”. Philologus, vol. 97, 1948, pp. 1-36.

Cataldo, Gustavo. “El saber de visión en Aristóteles”. Iter. Encuentros, vol. 3, 1995, pp. 149-57.

Diels, Hermann. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker I. Berlín: Wiedmannsche Buchhandlung, 1956.

Heidegger, Martin. Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie. Fráncfort del Meno: Klostermann, 2002.

Heidegger, Martin. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 2001.

Heidegger, Martin. Zollikoner Seminare. Fráncfort del Meno: Klostermann, 1994.

Martínez Marzoa, Felipe. Iniciación a la filosofía. Madrid: Istmo, 1974.

Platón. Fedón. Diálogos III. Madrid: Gredos, 2007.

Platón. República. Diálogos IV. Madrid: Gredos, 1998.

Schapp, Wilhelm. Metaphysik der Naturwissenschaft. Fráncfort del Meno: Klostermann, 2009.

Tugendhat, Ernst. TI KATA TINOS. Freiburg/Múnich: Karl Alber, 2003.

Xolocotzi, Ángel y Antonio Zirión. ¡A las cosas mismas! Dos ideas sobre la fenomenología. México: Maporrúam, 2018.

Zirión, Antonio. “Equívocos y precisiones sobre los conceptos de fenómeno y fenomenología”. Diánoia, vol. 33, n.º 33, 1987, pp. 283-99.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de humanidades (Santiago. En línea)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...